Social Media 411: Who Owns Your Images?
As Yahoo Inc, Flicker’s owner, starts selling canvased prints from photos uploaded to the site (with all profits being kept by Yahoo), it brings into question who owns the rights to these images?
We all do it. When the endless list of policies pops up, asking you to agree to the terms and conditions, we skim to the bottom bla bla bla and click accept without much thought. But reading the small print could do you a lot of favours in the long run. Would you happily upload personal images if you knew they could be taken and used by other companies or websites?
Here’s the lowdown on the privacy policies of the most popular social media platforms for uploading pics.
Facebook has a license to use your content in any way it sees fit, including transferring or sub-licensing rights of your content to another company or organisation. As well as this, Facebook’s license does not end upon the deactivation or deletion of your account, oh no, instead, it means that any tagged photos, videos or status will remain under Facebook’s license until all those who’ve interacted with the content have also deactivated, deleted or untagged the content. So if you’ve been tagged in a photo or status, it will remain under Facebook’s license until all tags and accounts associated with the status/photo/video are removed also. Uh-huh.
Scoopshooter: Ariann Titanium Rousu
A photo posted to Twitter remains your intellectual property, but if you accept Twitter’s terms you allow them “a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license (with the right to sublicense)”. Essentially, this gives Twitter almost total control over your images and the ability to do pretty much anything with them. As well as photo content, Twitter’s terms give it broad scope to distribute, use and change any written or video media posted through Twitter, including those which Twitter has not yet thought of or developed.
Scoopshooter: Stefano Pafumi
Instagram caused a stir in 2012 leading lots of users to delete their accounts, when proposed changes to its Terms of Service would have allowed the photo-sharing app to sell images to advertisers without compensating users… which obviously didn’t go down well. After a huge backlash from Instagram users, Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom was forced to release a blog post stating, “we do not have plans for anything like this and because of that we’re going to remove the language that raised the question.”
The policy now reads, “our Privacy Policy explains how we and some of the companies we work with collect, use, share and protect information in relation to our mobile services, web site, and your choices about the collection and use of your information.” So really, it doesn’t sound too much better?
Scoopshooter: Lasse Hendricks
Flickr
This one really takes the biscuit. Yahoo’s terms state “for photos, graphics, audio or video you submit or make available on publicly accessible areas of the Yahoo Services, you give to Yahoo the worldwide, royalty-free and non-exclusive licence to use, distribute, reproduce, adapt, publish, translate, create derivative works from, publicly perform and publicly display the User Content on the Yahoo Services.” Anything else you’d like to do with it Yahoo?
Scoopshooter: Juliëtte I. Rosbergen
It’s safe to say that once you upload an image to the internet its out there in public view and these images could essentially be used by anyone, not just social media apps (though a quick thanks for letting us know you might…). So does the chance that an image might be ‘used or changed or distributed’ by these companies put you off uploading your images? Or is the buzz of getting 14 ‘likes’ too much to pass up? We want to know where you stand on this one because, personally, we think that protecting your image rights matters.
9 Comments
Christine
December 16, 2014Thank you for this brilliant article and its conclusion. Common sense should prevail. Professionals know what they are doing when they upload images. It’s just part of the investment in their business. The return on that investment is questionable. Is it worth sacrificing a few (of the best) images in return for exposure, and to what public?
Charlotte Platzer
December 22, 2014Perhaps… or use a platform that respects your rights!
brave Frontier cheats
January 2, 2015Hello! This is my first visit to your blog! We are a group
of volunteers and starting a new project in a community in the same niche.
Your blog provided us beneficial information to work on. You have done
a marvellous job!
celtic jewellery
January 5, 2015This is very attention-grabbing, You’re an overly skilled blogger.
I’ve joined your rss feed and stay up for looking for mmore
of your magnificent post. Also, I’ve shared youjr site in my social networks
cheats for spider man unlimited
January 5, 2015Every weekend i used to pay a visit this site, because i want enjoyment,
as this this web page conations actually pleasant funny stuff too.
best dating sites
January 9, 2015Wonderful article! That is the kind of information that should be shared around
the internet. Disgrace on the search engines for not positioning this publish
higher! Come on over and discuss with my website .
Thanks =)
a knockout post
January 10, 2015I just want to tell you that I am very new to weblog and definitely enjoyed your web-site. Likely I’m want to bookmark your site . You definitely have excellent writings. With thanks for sharing your webpage.
food choices
January 11, 2015What’s up to every body, it’s my first pay a quick visit of this webpage;
this web site contains amazing and actually excellent stuff in support of
visitors.
Georgina
January 26, 2015How does it affect our rights as professional photographers if we put COPYRIGHT GEORGINA GOODWIN on the images? I post mine clearly at the bottom, is that enough? is it better to have it across the whole image to make image use difficult for thieves?
thanks.